Home » Uncategorized » Wheat Disease Update – May 6, 2017

Wheat Disease Update – May 6, 2017

About Me

David Marburger

David Marburger

Since April 2016, I have served as the Small Grains Extension Specialist at Oklahoma State University. My research and extension efforts focus on delivering science-based recommendations in order to increase small grains production and profitability for stakeholders throughout Oklahoma and the southern Great Plains.

View Full Profile →

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,906 other followers

This article was written by Dr. Bob Hunger, Extension Wheat Pathologist

Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology

Oklahoma State University – 127 Noble Research Center

405-744-9958 – bob.hunger@okstate.edu

 

Nearly all of the wheat I saw this past week was along a line for about 100 miles west of Stillwater. Wheat around Stillwater is at the milk to soft dough stage. Wheat west of Stillwater ranged from full kernel to full kernel-milk. In this area, I saw both good and bad wheat. Much of the bad wheat I saw had been hit with wheat streak mosaic (WSM). To date, the Plant Disease and Insect Diagnostic Lab (Ms. Jen Olson, Director) has assessed about 82 wheat samples from 19 counties for Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV), High plains virus (HPV), and Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV; PAV strain). These 19 counties are located west of Stillwater and mostly west of I-35. Of these 82 samples, 56 were positive for WSMV, 11 were positive for HPV (all 11 co-infected with WSMV), and 42 were positive for BYDV. Four of the samples were positive for all three viruses. These figures indicate the severity of wheat viruses in Oklahoma this year. Reports from other states indicate this problem (mite transmitted viruses such as WSM) is just as severe up through the central plains. The cool, wet weather we have had can mitigate the effects of WSM and BYD and help infected plants to continue to mature and finish. This would be especially true for plants/fields that were infected in the spring. However, yield and test weight will be affected especially if wheat was infected in the fall. For more information on mite-transmitted wheat viruses such as WSM, please see OSU Fact Sheet EPP-7328 (Wheat Streak Mosaic, High Plains Disease, and Triticum Mosaic: Three Virus Diseases of Wheat in Oklahoma) available at http://wheat.okstate.edu/wheat-management/insectsdisease/EPP-7328.

 

Regarding leaf and stripe rust, I have seen mostly leaf rust over the last week, but signs of stripe rust (both active and inactive) also can be observed. On susceptible varieties that were not sprayed, leaf rust was severe (≥60% flag leaf area showing pustules). In his nurseries at Lahoma in north-central OK, Dr. Brett Carver (OSU Wheat Breeder) is seeing some active and inactive stripe rust. Given our cool and wet weather, stripe rust appears to be re-activating. Dr. Carver also is seeing abundant and severe leaf rust.

 

Related to the rusts and fungicides, I came across an interesting situation in central OK that I would like to share. A producer called this past week indicating he had a wheat field with severe leaf rust on lower leaves, but flag leaves were still green and rust free. So, he had the field sprayed with a triazole fungicide combination. About two weeks after spraying, he felt the flag leaves were showing rust and more flecking/chlorosis than should occur after a fungicide spray. A field visit confirmed what I had seen several years ago in my fungicide trial here at Stillwater in 2012, that is, fungicide was applied when flag leaves were infected with leaf rust but no pustules had yet been formed. Figure 1A shows a wheat leaf with leaf rust pustules on a susceptible variety that was not sprayed along with a single wheat leaf rust pustule magnified 63 times. Figure 1B shows a wheat leaf of a susceptible variety from my fungicide trial in 2012 that was sprayed two weeks before the photo was taken with a triazole fungicide. I remember when first seeing this, I thought it was rust pustules forming, but the rust pustules looked “funny.” With closer inspection I realized the “pustules” I was seeing were basically dead or dying and no viable spores were being formed (Figure 1B). Figure 1C is a photo from the producer’s field I visited on Thursday, which was sprayed with a combination of triazole fungicides approximately two weeks earlier. Note the similarities between the photos in Figures 1B and 1C. To me, this demonstrates two points. The first point is that this is an example of the “curative” action of triazole fungicides. The leaves in Figure 1B and 1C were infected with the leaf rust fungus and the fungus had grown through the flag leaf although no pustules had yet formed. Hence, the flag leaves were green and healthy appearing. Application of the fungicide killed the fungus over a period of time (i.e., “cured” the fungus). Even though “remnant” pustules formed, no viable spores formed in the pustules because the fungus was dead/dying. The second point (and perhaps most important point) is that this demonstrates the importance to apply a fungicide sooner rather than later. The applications made in Figure 1B and 1C helped maintain some green leaf tissue (more in 1B than in 1C), but if not applied when the fungicide was applied, these leaves would have been completely rusted and there would be no green flag leaf area left to contribute to grain fill. As it is, the wheat in Figures 1B and 1C will see some yield and test weight reduction, but not nearly as much as if fungicide had not been applied.

figure1a

figure1b

figure1c

Figure 1. (A) Leaf rust pustules on a wheat leaf of a susceptible wheat variety not sprayed with a fungicide and an individual leaf rust pustule (63X magnification); (B) Leaf rust pustules on a wheat leaf of a susceptible wheat variety 2 weeks after being sprayed with a triazole fungicide in 2012 in my fungicide trial and an individual leaf rust pustule (63X magnification); (C) Leaf rust pustules on a wheat leaf of a susceptible wheat variety about 2 weeks after being sprayed with a triazole fungicide in a commercial field in 2017. Note the reduction in green leaf, and the darkening of rust pustules in 1B and 1C; also note the difference in the magnified pustules where spores are visible in the not-sprayed pustule (as well as on the leaf), but spores are absent in the pustule on the leaf that was sprayed 2 weeks prior.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: