Wheat Disease Update – 9 May 2020

This article was written by Bob Hunger, Extension Wheat Pathologist

This past week was quite cool across Oklahoma (mid 60s F in Stillwater today) and central Oklahoma received needed rain.  Unfortunately, western OK and the panhandle were not as fortunate and remain dry.  Wheat around Stillwater this week was as far along as the milk to soft dough stage; wheat today at Lahoma in north-central OK ranged considerably but was as far along as approaching full kernel but watery.

Stripe rust has fairly well shut down across the state as indicated by turning to the telial spore stage (see 27-April update at http://entoplp.okstate.edu/pddl/2020/PA%2019-15.pdf), and although this cool weather with rainfall and dew in central OK will favor stripe rust, I doubt if we will stay sufficiently cool and wet for stripe rust to pick up again across Oklahoma (plus, northwestern OK and the panhandle remain dry).  However, leaf rust has started to become more prevalent over this past week and likely will continue to increase in areas where there is rainfall or dew formation.  This past week around Stillwater, both Dr. Brett Carver and I were able to rate plots and trials around Stillwater for leaf rust incidence and severity.  Additionally this past week here at Stillwater for the first time in about a decade, I found wheat stem rust.  Recall there are three wheat rusts including stripe rust, leaf rust, and stem rust.  Stem rust is rare in Oklahoma and is only observed in years when we have an extended cool spring (much like this one).  Figure 1 shows photos comparing these three rusts on wheat leaves.  In contrast to the implication of its name, stem rust can occur on leaves as well as on stems, whereas pustules of stripe rust and leaf rust are more typically found on leaves.

Figure 1. The active spore stage (urediniospores) of the three wheat rusts, including stripe rust (left photo; credit to Dr. Guy Padgett, Louisiana State University), leaf rust (second photo from left), and stem rust (two photos on the right). Note the difference in color between stripe rust and the other two wheat rusts. Leaf rust and stem rust spores are similar in color, but stem rust pustules typically are more robust than leaf rust, often are found on leaves as well as stems, and seem to me to have a bit darker brick-red brown color than leaf rust.

Leaf browning also is still apparent around much of the state and has multiple causes this year as discussed in the 27-Apr Disease update (http://entoplp.okstate.edu/pddl/2020/PA%2019-15.pdf).  These causes include leaf spot diseases, freeze, drought, necrosis (tissue death) due to a resistant reaction to stripe rust, and even a browning due to an unknown physiological factor.  Over this past week, both Dr. Brett Carver and I have observed another possible cause of leaf browning, which is bacterial streak (Figure 2).  Bacterial streak isn’t usually a significant problem in Oklahoma, but occasionally has been observed in low to moderate incidence.  It causes not only a browning of leaves (but without the “pepper spots” as with Septoria/Stagonospora), but also can cause a darkening of the heads (black chaff).  As I said, we have not confirmed bacterial streak to be present, but it is a possibility.

Figure 2. Bacterial streak on wheat leaves (left phot; Dr. Jeff Edwards, Oklahoma State University), a wheat head and stem just under a wheat head (center photo), and causing black banding on wheat awns (right photo).

Finally, it is worth mentioning that a number of individuals have reported seeing a higher incidence of wheat heads with loose smut (Figure 3) this year.  This agrees with what Dr. Carver, Dr. Amanda de Oliveira Silva, and I have seen.  Spores of the loose smut fungus (Figure 3, right photo) are released in the field when wheat is flowering.  The spores infect the fertilized seed and are carried within the seed.  If this infected seed is used to plant the next year’s crop, the growing plant from that seed will be infected and produce loose smutted heads in the spring – hence, completing the disease cycle.  The ways to avoid problems from loose smut are to (1) not save seed wheat from fields in which loose smut is present, and (2) plant seed wheat treated with a fungicide labeled for use to manage loose smut.  Many such seed treatments are available.  I need to point out that if you have a field this year with loose smut and you plant treated wheat in this field next year, there may still be some loose smut-infected plants the next spring.  These infected plants would not be from the treated seed wheat, but are volunteer plants from the previously infected crop.  If you have questions about the bunts and smuts please contact your local county extension educator or me.

Figure 3. Loose smut of wheat. The center photo is to show that the smut fungus does not necessarily take over an entire head. The left photo is to show the powdery nature of the spores of the loose smut fungal pathogen.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Amanda De Oliveira Silva. Bookmark the permalink.

About Amanda De Oliveira Silva

I have served as an Assistant Professor and Small Grains Extension Specialist at Oklahoma State University since August 2019. I believe that close interaction with producers is vital to understand their production strategies and to establish realistic research goals. My program focuses on developing science-based information to improve the agronomic and economic viability of small grains production in Oklahoma and in the Southern Great Plains.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s